Vendor-Neutral Archives: The Rapid Shift in Image Archiving
Published on the Aug. 24, 2012, DiagnosticImaging.com website
By Whitney L.J. Howell
When it comes to image storing, PACS still rule the industry. But vendor-neutral archives (VNAs) — products that help you store and share studies across manufacturer systems — are gaining market share fast.
While only 5.4 percent of the nearly 1.5 billion worldwide imaging studies were stored by VNAs in 2011, VNAs are expected to archive more than 30 percent by 2016, according to a May 2012 InMedica report. In fact, a 2012 KLAS report found 27 percent of providers already plan to include VNAs in their image-storing strategies.
The shift toward VNA implementation has been — and, by most estimates, will continue to be — rapid. And, it’s a move that will impact your purchasing decisions, your image management, and how you shuttle images between institutions. The question, however, is what those impacts will look like.
Making a Purchase
Whether you work in a private practice or a hospital, roughly one-third of image CDs sent from one institution to another are unreadable because the PACS systems are different. This problem has long been understood as a patient-care issue, but it’s also a financial one, said Steve Tolle, senior vice president for solutions management for Merge Healthcare, vendor for the VNA system iConnect.
“Every image CD sent costs about $15 in addition to staff and physician time,” he said. “A hospital can spend between $60,000 and $70,000 annually on courier costs just shuffling CDs between hospitals. That’s a hard savings that can be had with the enterprise and share functionalities of a VNA.”
But you must be careful when selecting a VNA. Examine potential VNA vendors carefully, said Michael Gray, lead consultant at Gray Consulting, because some have modified their marketing efforts to sell PACS systems as VNAs. After you’ve narrowed your vendor choices down, request quotes from each. Remember, if the price tag is high, you can implement a VNA in stages, such as only replacing your tape library, to control costs.
“Identify what’s the most important thing for you to do right now. Do you want to move all your data? Do you want to stick it in a data center?” Gray said. “Have vendors show you creative pricing for putting in part of a VNA. Few real VNA vendors are so busy chasing the $4 million deals that they’re too busy to tell you what you can do for a couple hundred thousand.”
Impacting Image Storage and Management
Most hospital departments operate in separate worlds, making it difficult to share images across institutions. However, expected increases in team-based care and bundled payments will likely make this business and care model unsustainable.
“Interoperability is where we’re going in this world. We’re going to have to share images, so we can’t have these silos of data sitting around,” Holle said. “VNAs offer an entire view of a facility’s diagnostic images, and they provide a solution for all specialists — the cardiologists, the radiologists, the pathologists and others.”
Merge’s iConnect brings together images from any PACS in an institution and offers replicated content management, a feature that supplements back-up recovery by making and storing elsewhere automatic copies of images and data. iConnect also uses a standardized DICOM format that all vendor equipment can access, Tolle said.
Using a VNA will also impact how you interact with your referring physicians, said Merge’s Kurt Hammond, vice president for interoperability solutions. This tool can help you meet growing patient demands.
“Turnaround time is getting really aggressive as physicians expect faster and faster image reads for their patients,” he said. “With a VNA, you’ll save time because there will only be one place to go for images no matter which department they’re coming from.”
According to Shannon Werb, chief operating and strategy officer for Acuo Technologies, employing a VNA also provides you the autonomy to change how you manage your system or distribute your images without contacting the manufacturer.
Acuo’s VNA product, UCP3, is similar to iConnect. However, in addition to DICOM standards, it supports the global authority on international health information technology interoperability Health Level Seven International (HL7) and Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) profiles, including Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing (XDS).
VNAs can also save you the time and money you’d expend when migrating imaging data from an old PACS to a new system. Currently, it’s easier to let your PACS vendor transfer the data because it’s time consuming and can be confusing. Often, vendors change DICOM headers, such as CT of the head to CTHead or HeadCT, making it impossible to find some images if they aren’t categorized correctly in the new PACS. The cost for this service is often between $200,000 and $300,000.
To view remainder of story at original location:
http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/informatics-pacs/content/article/113619/2098615
August 31, 2012 - Posted by wjpalmer | Healthcare | Acuo Technologies, Carestream Health, challenges of vendor neutral archives, chief information officers and vendor neutral archives, Chris Tomlinson, cost of sending image CDs between hospitals, cost savings associated with vendor neutral archives, Cristine Kao, Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing (XDS), DICOM header changes, difference between vendor neutral archives and the cloud, Gray Consulting, Health Level Seven International, HL7, iConnect, InMedica reporting on VNAs, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE), Kurt Hammond, Merge Healthcare, Michael Gray, migrating data between PACS, number of diagnostic images stored in VNAs, PACS jail, Radiology Associates of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Shannon Werb, Steve Tolle, UCP3, vendor neutral archive and image storage autonomy, vendor neutral archives, vendor neutral archives and diagnostic imaging, vendor neutral archives and increased access to diagnostic images, vendor neutral archives and interoperability, vendor neutral archives and the cloud, VNAs, Vue Archive, Vue Cloud Archive
No comments yet.
Who am I?
I’m a seasoned reporter, writer, freelancer and public relations specialist with a master’s degree in international print journalism from The American University in Washington, D.C.
I launched my journalism career as a stringer for UPI on Sept. 11, 2001, on Capitol Hill. That day led to a two-year stint as a daily political reporter in Montgomery County, Md. As a staff writer for the Association of American Medical Colleges, a public relations specialist for the Duke University Medical Center and the public relations director for the UNC-Chapel Hill School of Nursing, I’ve earned in-depth experience in covering health care, including academic medicine, health care reform, women’s health, pediatrics, radiology, and Medicare.
-
Archives
- October 2019 (3)
- May 2018 (2)
- October 2017 (2)
- November 2016 (5)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (8)
- August 2016 (6)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (8)
- April 2016 (14)
- March 2016 (2)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Leave a Reply