What Can Radiologists Really Do About Unnecessary Imaging?
Published on the Jan. 15, 2015, DiagnosticImaging.com website
By Whitney L.J. Howell
Unnecessary imaging and appropriateness criteria. These two phrases have dominated radiology discussions for the past several years. It’s a complicated topic that has an even more complex, and elusive, answer.
And, according to industry leaders, one of the most critical components to the discussion is the role radiologists play in limiting the number of unnecessary and duplicative imaging studies performed.
“Radiologists get painted as these selfish people who are self-interested and who are going to fight against change,” said Jeremy Bikman, chief executive officer for peer60, a big data survey company that provides analysis based on conversations with on-the-ground professionals. “But, they didn’t create their reimbursement structure. It comes from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and radiologists are just doing the best they can.”
That performance includes responding to and meeting referring physicians’ needs and desires, which, frequently, he said, can be wasteful. A recent peer60 report puts the nationwide cost of unnecessary imaging between $7.47 billion and $11.95 billion annually.
To reach the article in its entirety at its original location: http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/practice-management/what-can-radiologists-really-do-about-unnecessary-imaging
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- October 2019 (3)
- May 2018 (2)
- October 2017 (2)
- November 2016 (5)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (8)
- August 2016 (6)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (8)
- April 2016 (14)
- March 2016 (2)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Leave a Reply